Davenport knew well the “study of defects found in
drafted men” because he co-wrote the detailed statistical report on the subject
for the Senate Committee on Military Affairs.2 This 1919 report of
more than 350 pages compiles data from medical examinations of 2.7 million men,
18 to 30 years old, drafted during the First World War. Examiners reported cases of what they regarded as mental or physical “defects,” which included a
wide range of diseases and conditions from heart disease, to asthma, to
blindness, to flat feet, to obesity, to drug addiction.
The report cuts the data three ways. First, it reports
the distribution of these “defects” among the states. It then divides most of
the states into smaller regions that reflect different economies: agricultural,
manufacturing, mining, or commuter regions. There is also a similar series with the data grouped by environment or terrain: mountain, desert, maritime regions, etc. In
these analyses, the researchers attempt to group the various health issues according to the draftee's occupation or milieu.
 |
| 1919 report by Albert G. Love and eugenics supporter Charles B. Davenport |
Then comes what the researchers term “the racial series.”
These “races” include groupings like “mountain whites,” “Indians” (Native Americans) and “Mexicans.”
There is also a number of breakout groups of “foreign born whites.” “Group
19” is the French Canadian “racial” group.
This group was created, like the other groups, by
aggregating areas with high concentrations of French-Canadians, where the
latter constituted more than 10 percent of the population. All such regions
were in New England, in the states of Maine, New Hampshire, Massachusetts and
Rhode Island. The French-Canadian
group had “the highest defect rate” of any of the “racial” groupings in the U.S. (266). Areas
with high concentrations of French-Canadians led the lists in a range of health
problems associated with low socioeconomic status including alcoholism, malnutrition,
and obesity.
Presenting their findings on “Group 19,” the
researchers state:
The French Canadian group shows an extraordinary excess of defects in various important respects, such as tuberculosis, spinal curvature, deaf-mutism, mental deficiency and psychoses, refractive errors [myopia and other eyesight issues], otitis media [inflammatory diseases of the ear], defective hearing, asthma, bad teeth, hernia, deficient size of chest, and height and underweight. The sections of which the French Canadians form a predominant factor are among the poorest from the military standpoint (46).
The French-Canadian group led the U.S. in alcoholism. Alcoholism
was high across New England in 1919 and not only in the areas with high
concentrations of French-Canadians. Of the ten states with the highest numbers
of alcoholics among drafted men, five of them were in New England (86, Table 12).
However, in the parts of New England with large French-Canadian populations, rates
of alcoholism were many times
higher than elsewhere. The rate of alcoholism among young men in the French-Canadian parts of
New England was 0.91 per 1000 persons. By contrast, populations such as the
Germans/Austrians and Russians in the U.S., stereotypically thought to enjoy a
drink, had rates of alcoholism of 0.38 and 0.21 per thousand respectively (269,
Table 106).
The French-Canadian grouping also had the highest
rates, by far, of men judged “underheight” and “underweight” (294, Tables 180,
181). They also had the highest incidence of diagnosed malnutrition except for
“mountain whites” and “Indians” living in “sparsely settled” places (294, Table
182). Anemia, a condition often caused by vitamin or mineral deficiency, was
found to be “exceptionally high in the French Canadian section(s) (305).” At
the same time, the highest rates of obesity in the U.S. were found in places
with large French-Canadian populations (272, Table 114).
The “French-Canadian immigrants” were also found to suffer from a high proportion
of “defective physical development.” But
exactly how this condition is defined and how it differs from “underweight” is
unclear even to the researchers. However, the rate of “total defective development
and nutrition” among the French-Canadian group was many times higher than that of
any other group listed: 85.26 persons per 1000, as compared with the next
highest numbers among Scottish-Americans and “mountain whites,” with about one-half
the rate of the French-Canadian group. The researchers own that “defective
development” “is due to a
variety of causes” (33-34). Since Davenport was a eugenics supporter, the report often wishes to find a “congenital” or “racial” cause for some alleged “defect.” But it admits that “defective physical development” has environmental components.
The group [showing ‘defective physical development’] has a great importance for social therapeutics, since it is largely due to unhygienic methods of living, although in considerable part due, also, to congenital defects…. A center for defective physical development is found in the States which center around Chattanooga, and it seems probable that this area is largely determined by the presence of hookworm infection. There is another center in New England, and this seems to be controlled very largely by the French-Canadian immigrants, who show a high rate of defective physical development (33-34).
“Unhygienic methods of living” are blamed for the undernourished conditions of young men in the mill towns, and not the
socioeconomic conditions that had turned the rural poor of Québec into a neglected labor pool destined for U.S. mills and factories. Whether the causes were congenital or environmental, many of the young men who came from the mill town milieu were no
longer physically fit even for the trenches.
Having found that the French-Canadian group scored
highest in a wide range of alleged “defects,” the authors then attribute the
poor showing of some New England states to high concentrations of
French-Canadians.
Rhode Island had the highest “defect rate” overall. “Conditions in which Rhode Island stands first or
second are: Alcoholism, obesity, neurosis, total for myopia and defective
vision (cause not stated), hemorrhoids, bronchitis, deformities of appendages
and trunk, atrophy of muscles of the appendages, underheight, and underweight (41).” Why does Rhode Island stand at or near the top in many “defects,” per Love and Davenport?
It is largely because of the defective or nonresistant stock which has been drawn to this the most urban of all the States—that in which the population is most generally engaged in manufacturing. While one may not ascribe the defects to the occupation, it is probable that the occupation has attracted stock with defects or susceptible to them. Next to Rhode Island stands Vermont....It is surprising in what a number of defects the small State of Vermont leads. The reason for this is probably because of the presence in Vermont of a large number of French Canadians in whom the defect rate is particularly high (41).Love and Davenport ascribe Rhode Island’s high “defect rate” to “defective stock” attracted by the state’s manufacturing, while Vermont’s is attributed to its “large number of French-Canadians.” However, elsewhere in the report, the authors find that these two states “have this in common that they contain a large proportion of Canadian French (149).” More than once, they claim that the reason for these states' poor showing is the French-Canadian presence.
The authors discuss some problems with the hypothesis that New
England’s health woes were due to “defective” French-Canadians. They observe that
New Hampshire had a larger percentage of French-Canadians than either Rhode
Island or Vermont, and yet it was in the middle of the pack as regards alleged
“defects.” The authors conclude that the “high position of Rhode Island and Vermont” with respect to “defects” is “due to a combination of...three factors...the thoroughness of the examinations made by local boards, the intelligence and
care exercised at Camp Devens [where New England draftees were examined] and the high percentage of French Canadians in
the population (149).”
Conditions that were environmental, a
consequence of living in fetid mill towns, are ascribed to
“congenital” causes. These conclusions were then used by eugenics proponents, like Davenport and Vermont’s
Henry Perkins, to class the French Canadians as an "inferior" breed in their racial hierarchies. Since French-Canadians in the mill towns were poor, they faced public
health challenges; these challenges were then essentialized by eugenics proponents and made a part of
the “racial” (their word) makeup of the French Canadian people.
Among the alleged “defects” that stemmed from life in the mill towns were problems with eyesight, hearing, and respiratory issues. And these health problems appear already in young men mostly in their twenties. High rates of obesity, malnutrition, and the off-the-chart rate of alcoholism show a community that’s been marginalized by the society of its day and relegated to an underclass status. Such a status, in all times and places, is hazardous to one’s health.
 |
| My maternal grandfather (right) and his brother in their WWI uniforms |
The data from drafted men paints a shocking portrait of the Franco-Americans in the mill towns in the early 20th century. They
emerge as among the most disadvantaged groups in the U.S.
from a public health perspective. When compared with groups recognized as poor or historically disadvantaged, such as “mountain whites,” rural Native Americans, and
Mexican-Americans, the data shows the tragically poor condition of
public health in the New England mill towns where the French-Canadians predominated.
Both of my grandfathers were in the military in the
World War One era and they were both born and raised in the areas Love and
Davenport have aggregated to create their French-Canadian “racial” group. Their data provides insight into the world of my grandparents, the places where they were born and raised. My
father was born less than a decade after the report on drafted men was issued,
in one of the heavily French-Canadian areas of Maine. The “defective” French-Canadian
men described here were relatives, friends and neighbors of my parents and
grandparents. This report captures the stark reality of the
mill town milieu that formed previous generations of Franco-Americans, the forbears of most of the two million French-Canadian
descendants who still live in New England. No surprise that little of what
happened there was passed down to younger generations.
For more on eugenics and Franco-Americans see Chapter 13 of my book A Distinct Alien Race.
For more on eugenics and Franco-Americans see Chapter 13 of my book A Distinct Alien Race.
--------------
Notes
Notes
1. David Vermette, A Distinct Alien Race (Montreal: Baraka Books, 2018), 256.
2. U.S. Congress, Senate, Defects Found in Drafted Men: Statistical
Information Compiled from the Draft Records, Prepared under the direction of
the Surgeon General, M.W. Ireland, by Albert G. Love, M.D. and Charles B.
Davenport, Printed for the use of the Senate Committee on Military Affairs, 66th
Congress, 1st Session, 1919. Parenthetical page numbers and table numbers refer to this report.
